[For the first entry in this series and pointers to the five follow-up posts, go here.]
I don’t think many will argue with me on this one.
But there is some subtlety here that most people don’t consider.
Tom Horton used to write a column in the Baltimore Sun called On the Bay. About five or six years ago he wrote a piece about the legislative scorecards put out by business groups and environmental groups.
He concluded that it is virtually impossible for a legislator to score highly on both types of scorecards.
As a voter and free-market environmentalist, I want my legislators to consider both business issues and environmental issues and find a reasonable balance. Any legislator who scores 90% to 100% on either type of scorecard is probably not getting that balance right.
And they probably won’t get my vote.
In Maryland, too many Democratic legislators seem to vote for any bill with an environment-friendly title without considering how much it will cost or how effective it will be.
From what I can see, legislators who consider both business and environmental concerns -- and find a sensible balance between the two -- are just as likely to be Republicans as Democrats.