- One's concern with the ethics of means and ends varies inversely with one's personal interest in the issue.
- The judgment of the ethics of means is dependent upon the political position of those sitting in judgment
- In war the ends justify almost any means
- Judgment must be made in the context of the times in which the action occurred and not from any other chronological vantage point.
- Concern with ethics increases with the number of means available and vice versa.
- The less important the end to be desired, the more one can afford to engage in ethical evaluations of means.
- Generally success or failure is a might determinant of ethics.
- Morality of a means depends upon whether the means is being employed at a time of imminent defeat or imminent victory.
- Any effective means is automatically judged by the opposition as being unethical.
- You do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments.
- Goals must be phrased in general terms like "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," "Of the Common Welfare," "Pursuit of Happiness," or "Bread and Peace."
Source: Alinsky's 1971 book titled Rules for Radicals
Thanks. Saves me searching.
ReplyDeleteBTW: Great display name. I lived in NYC for almost 10 years, part of which was in Hell's Kitchen, in the Mid-50s west of Broadway.
Used to spend time in Central Park. I remember when I first found the statue of Balto. It's just splendid. And Balto's story is inspiring.
Best wishes.